With cybercrime costs expected to reach $10.29 trillion in 2025,1 it’s clear that businesses need smarter tools to protect their networks – and their bottom line. Three solutions dominating the conversation today are Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), Managed Detection and Response (MDR), and Extended Detection and Response (XDR). While they all play an important role in cybersecurity, each offers unique capabilities that can help keep your organization safe.
In this blog, we’ll walk you through the differences between EDR, MDR, and XDR to help you understand which solution is right for your security needs.
EDR monitors and responds to threats at the endpoint level. Endpoints include devices like laptops, desktops, and servers – the primary targets for many cyberattacks. One report found that 68% of businesses have experienced one or more endpoint attacks that successfully compromised their data or network.2
EDR works well for businesses with internal IT or security teams that can actively monitor alerts and respond to threats. However, it requires technical expertise and constant attention.
MDR takes EDR a step further by bringing in outside cybersecurity expertise. MDR combines advanced detection tools with monitoring and incident response services from specialized teams.
MDR is ideal for businesses that lack the in-house expertise or resources to manage complex cybersecurity operations. It lets you tap into top-tier security without building an entire security team.
XDR builds on EDR by extending its monitoring and response capabilities beyond endpoints to include other areas of the network, such as email, servers, and cloud environments. It creates a unified platform for managing security across different layers.
XDR is best for organizations looking for a centralized and integrated approach to cybersecurity. It excels at detecting complex, multi-vector attacks that target multiple areas of the network.
|
Category |
EDR |
MDR |
XDR |
|
What it is |
A tool/platform for detecting and responding to threats on endpoints |
A managed service where a provider runs detection + response for you (often using EDR) |
A platform that extends detection/response beyond endpoints by correlating signals across multiple security domains |
|
Primary coverage |
Endpoints (laptops, desktops, servers) |
Usually endpoints first, but often expands based on provider scope |
Endpoints plus other layers like network, email, cloud, identity, and more (varies by vendor) |
|
Who operates it |
Your internal IT/Sec team |
A provider’s security team (24/7 in most cases) |
Typically your team, but can also be purchased as managed XDR |
|
Visibility |
Deep endpoint telemetry |
Strong visibility where the provider is monitoring (commonly endpoints + selected sources) |
Broader, cross-domain visibility with event correlation across sources |
|
Detection approach |
Endpoint behavior analytics + investigation workflows |
Tooling + human-led monitoring, triage, and threat hunting |
Cross-source correlation + analytics (often includes automation to reduce alert noise) |
|
Response |
You respond (isolation, remediation actions) |
Provider guides or executes response (depending on model) |
Can orchestrate response across domains; response depth depends on integrations and playbooks |
|
Operational effort |
Higher (tuning, triage, response ownership) |
Lower (outsourced monitoring and expertise) |
Medium to high (integration + tuning), often lower day-to-day triage once mature |
|
Best fit |
You have security staff and want stronger endpoint protection |
You want expert coverage without building a full SOC |
You have a complex environment and need unified detection/response across tools and domains |
|
Common tradeoff |
Great on endpoints, but limited context beyond them |
Less direct control; quality depends on provider + scope |
More complexity upfront (integration, data sources), and outcomes depend on how well it’s deployed |
|
Typical outcome |
Better endpoint detection + faster containment on devices |
Faster time to 24/7 coverage and guided/managed response |
Better detection of multi-stage, multi-vector attacks and more centralized operations across security stack |
Every organization’s risk profile is different, so the right option depends on your environment, your internal resources, and how much visibility you need beyond endpoints.
In practice, many organizations don’t choose only one of these approaches. Instead, they combine them to build a layered defense that matches their needs and resources.
In many environments, EDR serves as the starting point. It places sensors on endpoints and gives you the foundational telemetry you need to understand what’s happening on devices and respond to threats. Even when organizations move to XDR, endpoint data remains a core building block.
MDR often sits on top of EDR, XDR, or a broader security stack. Rather than replacing your tools, the MDR team uses them to monitor your environment, investigate alerts, and contain threats. This lets you benefit from both the technology you’ve invested in and the experience of a specialist security team.
XDR brings data from multiple sources together, providing a single place to see and act on threats across your environment. For organizations that choose both XDR and MDR, XDR becomes the platform where signals are correlated and prioritized, while the MDR team focuses on analysis and response.
By combining EDR, MDR, and XDR in the right way, you can balance visibility, automation, and expert support without overcomplicating your security program.
Partner With Aseva for the Right Cybersecurity Solution
Choosing the right cybersecurity solution depends on your organization’s unique needs, resources, and goals. At Aseva, we specialize in helping mid-sized businesses navigate the complexities of cybersecurity to ensure you find a solution that solves your problems.
Our seasoned experts offer tailored guidance, implementation, and ongoing support for cybersecurity solutions, including EDR, MDR, and XDR. We’ll simplify the decision-making process – so you can focus on running your business with confidence.
Ready to strengthen your cybersecurity? Contact Aseva today to learn more about how we can help.
EDR is a tool focused on detecting and responding to threats on endpoints. MDR is a managed service where experts monitor and respond for you, often using EDR. XDR is a platform that correlates detection and response across multiple domains like endpoints, email, cloud, identity, and network.
No. EDR is technology you operate. MDR adds a provider’s security team to run monitoring, investigation, and response.
No. MDR typically includes EDR capabilities, but the difference is the managed 24/7 service and expert response.
XDR is primarily about broader, cross-domain visibility and correlation in one platform. MDR is primarily about who runs detection and response, a provider doing it as a service. You can also have managed XDR.
It depends. EDR can be “better” if you only need strong endpoint coverage and have staff to run it well. XDR can be “better” if you need visibility and response across endpoints plus cloud, email, identity, and network, and want stronger correlation for complex attacks.
In many cases, yes. MDR services often rely on EDR or similar tooling to collect endpoint telemetry and respond to threats. EDR provides the technology, while MDR brings the expertise and 24/7 coverage needed to get the most from it.
Sources: